Sunday, 29 March 2015

Postcolonial theory & cultural studies


Dave Mayuri P.

M. A. English Sem -2

Roll no. 13

Paper no. 7

Topic :- Postcolonial Theory & Cultural Studies

Submitted :- Department Of English M. K. B. U.


      
          - : Postcolonial Theory & Cultural Studies:- 
        
Postcolonial definition:-   

                               Post colonialism is the study of the legacy of the era of European and sometimes American, direct global domination, which ended roughly in the mid-20th century, and the residuals political, socio-economic and psychological effects of that colonial history.
    
                    Postcolonial studies is an academic discipline featuring methods of intellectual discourse, that analyze explain, and respond to the cultural legacies of colonialism and imperialism, to the human consequences of controlling a country and establishing settlers for the economic exploitation of the native people and their land. drawing from postmodern schools of thought, postcolonial studies analyses the politics of knowledge creation control and distribution by analyzing the functional relations of social and political power, that the how colonialism and Neocolonism the how and why of an imperial regime’s representations colonizer and of the 
Colonize people. 
 
                         As a genre of contemporized history, post colonialism questions and reinvents the modes of cultural perception – the ways of viewing and of being viewed.as Anthropology, post colonialism records human relations among the colonial nation and the subaltern peoples exploited by colonial rule as a critical theory, post-colonial presents, explains and the praxis of neocolonialism, with examples drawn from the humanities history from the humanities history and Marxist theory sociology, anthropology, and human geography; the cinema, religion and theology, feminism linguistics and postcolonial literature, of which the anti-conquest narrative genre presents of the subaltern man and woman. 
    
                       Colonialism has been an integral part of the history of numerous nations is Asia, Africa and South America. European nations controlled much of the world’s resources and populations from the seventeenth century, well into the twentieth. 

                        Postcolonial theory looks at the ways in which the non-white races have been subject to oppression and exploitation during colonial rule. It foregrounds questions of race in discussion about the west and west’s interaction with the East. It also looks at how the present age of globalization brings back memories of colonialism, albeit in a new frame and with newer rhetoric and modes of exploitation.  
        
           In postcolonial studies, the task to see how colonial systems of knowledge –medical, legal, literary –enabled oppression.it seeks to explore the modes of representation through which colonial writings and culture justified exploration and oppression. 

               Postcolonial theory in cultural studies  looks at the global calculation of Euro-American culture, with uses products created out of exploited Third world labor, the question of race and gender in economic and cultural policies, the centrality of techniques of representation to the cultural imperialism of the Euro-American nations. 
   
               The category of ‘Man’, argue post colonialists, means only ‘White man’ because the non-white is rendered less than human within colonialism. Eventually, through western education and ‘acculturation’ the native also comes to believe in this stereotype of the white man as superior and himself as inferior. Postcolonial critics are very interested in literary and cultural representation of the non-white races by Europeans because they argue such representations are extremely powerful.   
 
                 Other Thinkers like Homi Bhabha argue that the stereotype actually reflects the flaw and anxieties within colonialism where the stereotype is an attempt to maintain stability. Colonialism for Bhabha is ambivalent because on the one hand it wants to ‘improve’ the native into being more like the white man, but on the other does not want to lose its status of being uniquely white. 
      
                 Contemporary   postcolonial studies look at the ways in which globalization works on the same principles of earlier colonialism. The free trade agreements and treaties benefit the west even as they exploit the Asian nations. Global immigration policies suit particular skills alone, and not the lower working classes.
 
                 The global circulation of Hollywood, for critics like Simon during (2000), is a colonizing phenomenon where cultural and material icons and actions are sold by a first world corporation in Asian markets and ease out local, ethnic products. Racism is not completely dead even in the politically correct age. The differential salary –wage structures that enable medical transcription or BPO work involves, in postcolonial studies questions of race statistics will reveal that Indian call center workers are paid far lower than the US basic minimum wage. Postcolonial theory asks us to pay attention to the politics or representation of non-white races in white-race-controlled media.    
  
               -: Cultural Studies:-   
  
     Cultural studies definition:-  
 
                             Cultural study is interested in the processes by which power relation between and within groups of human beings organizes cultural art effects such as food habits, Music, cinema, sports events and celebrity culture and their meanings. Before we define ‘Cultural studies’ we need to understand the key terms used by he discipline.   
                               Postcolonial studies is concerned, as the chapter on theories explores, the oppression in past or present of the non-European races by European ones, cultural studies in globalized age also needs to be conscious of the racial zed nature of globalizing culture. That is, the theme of race and unequal relations has to be worked into any analysis of global cultures. For instances, we need to ask how Hollywood films circulate globally. Does the fact that audiences in Asia or Africa will be viewing these films influence the film- maker? How does a Hollywood film appear to poorer nation in these areas of the world? Think of films like romancing the stone, Indiana jones and Blood Diamond which explore other cultures- how are these conceived by Americans and received by other parts of the world? 
             Cultural studies are alert to the postcolonial perspective in global cultures. Colonialism is a kind of globalization where the European settler imposes his cultures. The current phase of globalization is therefore one more moment in the colonial process. MTV, CNN, Levi’s and McDonald’s are global companies with local presence and effects. In a sense globalization has indeed become synonymous with Americanization that has become a cliché. A cultural study therefore examines the role of globalizing finances and markets in the formation of cultures. Shared economies in globalization influence cultural modes, what cultural studies are interested in.  
  
               What does such a link between postcolonial theories mean for cultural studies in a globalizing age?   
    
    What is, however important to keep in mind is that a culture cannot be reduced to its material goods or products. The presence of American food products or clothing does not mean an extensive Americanization is on. At the same time these are not merely material products; they often carry cultural values. Thus postcolonial cultural studies must be conscious of:   

·      The material nature of any particular product / object.
·      The marketing and symbolic values assigned to the object.
·      The economic gains / losses with the arrival of global product.
·      The ‘share’ of the culture / economy in the production and profits of the global product.
·      The kind of images associated with the objects its cultural value.

     Even though globalization produced ‘hybrid’ products and cultural values, the question of economic gain must underwrite our analysis of even these products. This analysis therefore is firmly rooted in a postcolonial perspective.
 

What is strcturalism? How is it aplied to the study of literature?


                                        Name :- Dave Mayuri P. 
                              M.A. Sem- 2   
 
                               Roll No - 13.
 
Paper no- 8 Indian writing english

Topic name: - what is structuralism? How is it applied to the study of literature?
         Submitted by: -Department of English.( M. K. B.U.)    
   
   
           What is structuralism? How is it applied to the study of literature?    
            
  Structuralism (structuralist criticism): it is the offshoot of certain developments in linguistics and anthropology. Saussure’s mode of the synchronic study of language was an attempt to formulate the grammar of a language from a study of parole. Using the Saussurian linguistic model, Claude Levi-Strauss examined the customs and conventions of some cultures with a view of arriving at the grammar of those cultures. Structuralist criticism aims of forming a poetics or the science of literature from a study of literary works. It takes for granted ‘the death of the author’; hence it looks upon works as self – organized linguistic structures. The best works in structuralist poetics has been done in the field of narrative.  
  
                    In literary theory, structuralism is an approach to analyzing the narrative material by examining the underlying invariant structure. For examples, a literary critic applying a structuralist literary  theory might say that the author of West side story did not write anything “really” new, because their works has the structure as Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Jolliet’. In both text a girl and a boy fall in love a ‘formula’ with a symbolic operator between them would be “Boys + Girls” despite the fact that they belong to two groups that hate each other. “Boy’s Group – Girls Group” or “opposing force” and conflict is resolved by resolved by their death.  
 
                           The versatility of structuralism is such that literary critic could make the same claim about a story of two friendly families boys family and girls family that arrange a marriage the justification is that the second story’s structure is an ‘inversion’ of the first story’s structure: between the values of love and the two pairs of parties involved have been reversed.  
  
                        Structuralist literary criticism argues that the “novelty value of a literary text” can lie only in new structure, rather than in the specifics of character development and voice in which that structured is expressed. 
\   
                Gerard Genette and structuralist criticism:-  
  Gerard genette  writes at the outset in his essay ‘structuralism and literary criticism’ that methods developed for the study of one discipline could be satisfactory applied to the study of other discipline as well. This is what he calls “intellectual bricolage”, borrowing a structuralism is the name given to Saussure’s approach to language as a system of relationship. But it is applied also to the study of philosophy, literature and other sciences of humanity. 
   
                 Structuralism as a method is peculiarly Imitable to literary criticism which is a discourse upon a discourse. Literary criticism in that it is meta-linguistic in character and comes into being/ existence as met literature. In his words: “it can be meta literature, that is to say, ‘a literature of which literature is the imposed object’.” That is, it is literature written to explain literature and language used in it to explain the role of language in literature.   
 
              In Genette’s words, ‘if writer questions the universe, the critic questions literature, that is to say, the universe of signs. But what was assign for the writer becomes meaning for the critic (since it is the object of the world) becomes a sign for the critic, as the theme and symbol of a certain literary nature’. Now this being so, there is certain room for reader’s interpretation. Levi-Strauss is quite right when he says that the critic always puts something of himself into the works he read. 
 
     The structuralist method of Criticism:-    
                             Literature, being primarily a work of language, and structuralism in its part, being prominently a linguistic method, the most probable encounter should obviously take place on the terrain of linguistics material. Sound, forms, words and sentences constitute the common object of the linguist of the linguist and the philologist to much an extent that it was possible, in the early Russian formalist movement, to define literature as a mere dialect, and to envisage its study as an annex of general dialectology.
  
                           Traditional criticism regard criticism as a message without code; Russian formalism regards literature as code without message. Structuralism by structural analysis makes it possible to uncover the connection that exists between a system of forms and for over all homologies (likeness, similarity).”
  
                   Meaning is yielded by the structural relationship within a given work. It is not introduced from outside. Genette believed that the structural study of ‘poetic language’ and of the forms of the literary expression cannot reject the analysis of the relations between code and message. The ambition of structuralism is not confined to counting feet and to observe the repetition of phonemes: it must also study sematic word meaning phenomena which constitute the essence of poetic language. It is in this reference that Genette writes: “one of that newest and most fruitful directions that are now opening up for literary research ought to be the structural study of the ‘large unities’ of discourse, beyond the framework – which linguistics in the strict sense cannot caross- of the sentence.” One would thus study systems from of literary expression. There would be linguistics of discourse that was translinguistics.   
 
                              Genette empathetically defines structuralism as a method is based on the study of structure wherever they occur. He further adds, “but to begin with, structures are not directly encountered objects- far from it; they are systems of latent relations, conceived rather than perceived, which analysis contracts as it uncovers them, and which it runs the risk of investing while believing that it is discovering them”. Furthermore, structuralism is not a method; it is also what Ernst Cassirer a ‘general tendency of thought’ or as others would say more crudely an ideology, the prejudice of which is precisely to value structures at the expense of substances.  



                            Genette is of the view that analysis that confines itself to a work without considering its sources or motives would be implicitly structuralist, and the structural method ought to intervene in order to give this immanent study a sort of rationality of understanding that would replace the rationality of explanation abandoned with the search of causes. Unlike Russian formalist, structuralist like Genette gave importance to thematic study also. “Thematic analysis”, writes Genette , “would tend spontaneously to culminate and to be tested in a structural synthesis in which the different themes are grouped in networks, in order to extract their full meaning from their place and function in the system of the works.” Thus, structuralism would appear to be a refuge for all immanent criticism against the danger of fragmentation that threatens thematic analysis.
   
              Genette believes that structural criticism is untainted by any of the transcendent reductions of psychoanalysis or Marxist explanation. He further writes, “It exerts, in its own way, a sort of internal reeducation, traversing the substance of the work in order to reach its bone-structure: certainly not a superficial examination, but a sort of radioscopic penetration, and all the more external in that is more penetrating.” 
  
                Thus to conclude we many say, the structuralist idea is to follow literature in its overall evolution, while making synchronic cuts at various stages and comparing the tables one with another. Literary evolution then appears in all its richness, which derives from the fact that the system survives while constantly altering. In this sense literary history becomes the history of a system: it is the evolution of the functions that is significant , not that of the elements, and knowledge of the synchronic relations necessarily precedes that of the processes.    
     
                        
                        
   


Dickens Work


                       Dave Mayuri P.
                  M. A. English SEM 2
                         Roll no. 13
    Paper no. 6 The Victorian Literature
             Topics :- Dickens work
Submitted :- Department of English M. K. B. U.

                      Dickens works.                 

                   
      Introduction of Charles Dickens:-  
                            
                  Charles dickens was born in land port, Hampshire England on February 7, 1812, to john and Elizabeth dickens. He was the second of eight children. His mother had been in service to lord crew, and his father worked as a clerk for the naval play office. John dickens was imprisoned for debt went to work at blacking warehouse, managed by a relative, and his brush with hard times and poverty affected him deeply. He later recounted these experiences in the semi – autobiographical novel “David Copperfield.” Similarly, the concern for social justifies in his writing grew out of harsh conditions he experienced in the warehouse. 
               
                    As a young boy, Charles dickens was exposed to many artistic and literary works that allowed his imagination to grow and develop considerably. He was greatly influenced by the stories his nursemaid used to tell him and by his many visits to the theater. Additionally, dickens loved to read. Among his favorite works was Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes, tom jones by Henry fielding, and Arabian Nights, all of which were ‘Picaresque Novel’ composed of a series of loosely linked adventure. This format no doubt played a part in dickens idea to serialize his future works. 
  
                     Dickens was able to leave the blacking factory after his father’s release from prison, and he continued his education at the wellington house academy. Although he had little formal schooling, dickens was able to teach himself shorthand and launch a career as a journalist. At the age of sixteen, dickens got himself a job as a court reporter, and shortly thereafter he joined the staff of a mirror of parliament a newspaper that reported on the decisions of parliament. During this time Charles continued to read voraciously at the British library, and he experimented with acting and stage-managing amateur theatricals. His experience acting would affect his work throughout his life he was known to act to characters he was writing in the mirror and then describe himself as the character in prose in his novels.       
                  
                     Dickens developed an interest in social reforms and began contributing to the True sun, a radical newspaper. Although his main avenue of work would consist of writing novels, dickens continued.  
 
                       Novels by Charles Dickens:-   
                         
1.   The Pickwick Paper – 1836.
2.   Oliver Twist – 1837.
3.   Nicholas Nickel by – 1838.
4.   The Old curiosity – 1840.
5.   Barnaby rude – 1841.
6.   Dom bay and son – 1846.
7.   David Copperfield – 1849.
8.   Bleak House – 1852.
9.   Hard times – 1854.
10.  Little Diorite – 1855.
11.  A tale of two cities -1859.
12.  Great expectations -1860.
13.  Our mutual friend- 1864.
14.  The mystery of edvin-1870. 



                  -: The Christmas Books:- 
1.   A Christmas carols / illustrated by Authors Rackham (1843).
2.   The chimes (1844).
3.   The cricket on the hearth (1845).
4.   The battle of life (1846).
5.   The Haunted Man and the ghost’s Bargain (1848).
       
-: Christmas stories from “House hold words” and “All the year Round.”:-  
 
1.   A Christmas tree (1850).
2.   The poor relation’s story (1852).
3.   The child story (1852).
4.   The schoolboy’s story (1853).
5.   The Holly tree (1855).
6.   Wreak of the golden Mary (1856).
7.   Going to society (1858).
8.   A message from the sea (1860).
9.    Mrs. Larruper’s legacy (1864).
10.                     Mug by junction (1866).  

-: Other short stories:-   
1.Master Humphrey’s clock (1840).
2.The lamplighter’s story (1841).
3.A house to let (1858).
4.The single man.
5.The haunted house (1859).
6.The trial for murder.
7.Hunted down (1860).
8.A holiday romance (1868).  

-: Life of Charles dickens:- 
     
         Dickens was driven to achieve success from the day of his Boyhood. With little formal education, he thought himself, worked furiously at everything he undertook and rocketed to fame as a write in his mid-twenties. He continued to work assiduously to the end of his life. Besides making a prodigious contribution to English literature, as a writer of fiction, he edited a weekly journal for twenty years and became an accomplished performer of his own works. Some details of his life are given below.  
    * Making the most of a modest beginning (1827-29). :- 
 His education over at the age of 15.employed by a firm of solicitors made a great impression as a lively character, a skilled mimic, with an encyclopedic knowledge of London. Studied shorthand and was later to achieve an exceedingly high standard. 
  
* Established in journalism (1829-33). *     
         Started as a freelance reporter of law cases admitted as radar at the British museum library in 1830.became a parliamentary reporter in 1831. 
  
-: Frame and Dynamic progress as an author (1836-40).-
  
                 Became household name through the publication in installments of Pickwick papers,1836-37.left the morning chronicle in 1836Editor of new magazine, Bentley’s miscellany, from 1837 to 1839 wrote ‘Oliver Twist’, ‘Nicholas Nickel by’ and shorter pieces. 
    
   
·     A new role of journalism (1856-67). :-  

Gave first public readings of his works in 1858.established in 1859.a new weekly journal, all the year. Bound which replaced household words serialization of A Tale of two critics began with first number. Contributed two other major works during this period; great friend. Readings assume greater importance. Involved in major rail accident, 1865 last Christmas story published in1867.   
                       
        -: About Oliver twist:-

Oliver twist is born in a workhouse in 1830s England. His mother’s name is unknown. After giving birth she dies. Oliver spends his childhood in a badly run orphanage and he is shifted to the workhouse for adults. Oliver’s mother is criticized by some people. Oliver attracts them. Oliver runs away and travels toward London. Oliver meets jack Dawkins, a boy his own age 0ffred shelter by jack in London. The benefactor of the house is Fagin. Fagin is a career criminal who trains orphan boys to pick pockets for him. Oliver is sent to pick pocketing mission. Meets Mr. Brownlow is stuck by Oliver’s resemblance to a portrait of young woman that hangs in his house. Oliver thrives in Mr. Brownlow’s home, but two young adults in Fagin’s gang, Bill Skies and his lover Nancy, capture Oliver and return him to Fagin. Mrs. May lie and her beautiful adopted niece rose. They grow found of Oliver, and he spends an idyllic summer with them in the countryside. A mission to recapture Oliver, Oliver’s mother and the gold locket monks destroys that locket. Nancy informs rose about Fagin’s intrigue is murdered by skies commits suicide. Mr. Brownlow, with whom they May lies have reunited Oliver, confronts Monks and wrings the truth about Oliver’s parentage from him.it, is revealed that monks is Oliver’s half-brother.    

                 Oliver twist as a message of social reforms.in Oliver twist dickens situates himself and his readers among some complex areas of the criminal law….he criticizes the poor laws of 1834.social and the individuals in Oliver Twist. The story of orphan Oliver set against the seamy underside of the London criminal world. The parish boy’s progress-Oliver’s journey back to his origin.

    

                   - : Dickens as a socialist. :- 

  

                                Child Labor: the cause of industrial revolution. A cheap human labor because most of children began working at five years of age and were not allowed leaving the factory until they were twenty-one. The children had to sign contracts called indentures that virtually made them the property of the factory owner. The abuses of the poor law system the evils of the criminal world in London “justice is blind”. The victimization of children: macabre of childhood Victorian idea of charity: the workhouse was a failed attempt to solve the problem of poverty and unwanted children. Oliver Twist: the manifestation of Victorian social conscience dark sides of the novel isolation of the young hero. Idealization in Oliver twist. Dickens dream of ‘ideal’ society. The novel of crime and punishment virtue in dehumanized society.