Saturday, 6 February 2016

Robinson Crusoe as a Mythmaker

Name:- Dave Mayuri P.
M.A. Sem:- 1
Paper no:-  2  The Neo classical literature.
Roll no:- 15.
Topic name:- Robinson Crusoe as a Mythmaker.

 Submitted by:- Department of English. M.K.B.U.



Robinson Crusoe as a Mythmaker:-
   Introduction:-  Robinson Crusoe is novel written by Daniel Defoe, first published on 25 April 1719.This first edition credited the works fictional protagonist Robinson Crusoe as its author leading many readers to believe he was a real person and the book a travelogue of true incident. It was published under the considerably longer original title. The life and strange surprising adventures of Robinson Crusoe of York years all alone in an un-inhabited island on the great river of Oroonoque having been cast o shore by shipwreck, where in  all the men perished but himself. With a account how he was at last as strangely delivered by pirates. Epistolary, confessional and didactic in form the book is fictional autobiography of the title Character a who spends years o a remote tropical island near Trinidad, encountering cannibals, captives and mutineers before being rescued.


        The story widely perceived to have been influenced by the life of Alexander Selkirk, a Scottish cast way who lived for four years on the Pacific island called in 1966 its name was changed to Robinson Crusoe Island, Chile. Defoe was inspired by Latin or English translations of Ibn Tufails Harry ibn yadhan.
            Despite its simple Narrative style Robinson Crusoe was well received in the literary world and is often credited as marking the beginning of realist fiction as a literary genre.

Robinson Crusoe as a Mythmaker:-
 
    The novel protagonist and narrator Crusoe begins the novel middle as a young middle-class man in York in search of a career he father recommended the law but Crusoe yearns for a life at sea, and his Subsequent rebellion and decision to become a merchant is the starting point for the whole adventures that followers. His vague but recurring feelings of guilt over his disobedience color the first part of the first half of the story and show us how deep Crusoe’s religions fear is. Crusoe is steady and Plodding In everything he does and his perseverance ensure his survival through Strom, enslavement and a twenty eight year isolation on a desert island.
   
                     While he is no flashy hero grand epic adventure Robinson Crusoe displays character traits that have won him the approval of generations of readers. His Perseverance in spending months making a canoe and practicing pottery making until he gets it right is Praiseworthy. Additionally his resourcefulness in building a home, dairy, grape arbor country house and goat stable for practically nothing is clearly remarkable.

                      The Swiss Philosopher Jean –Jacques Rousseau applauded Crusoe’s do-it yourself independence and In his book on education Emilee he recommends that children be thought to imitate Crusoe’s hands on approach to life. Crusoe’s business instincts are just as considerable as his Survival instruct he manages to make a fortune in Brazil despotic a twenty eight years absence and even leaves his island with nice Collection of gold. Morever Crusoe is never interested in Portraying himself as a hero in his own narration. He does not boast of his courage in quelling the maternity and he is always ready to admit un heroic feeling of fear or panic as when he finds the foot print on the beach Crusoe Prefers to depict himself as an ordinary sensible man never as an exceptional hero.
            But Crusoe’s admirable qualities must be weighed against the flaw in his character Crusoe seems incapable of deep feelings as shown by his cold account of leaving his family he worries about the religious consequences of disobeying his father but never displayed any emotion about leaving. Though he is generous toward people as when he gives gifts to his sisters and Captain Crusoe revels very little tender or sincere affection in his dealing with them. when Crusoe tell us that he was gotten married and that his wife has died all within the Same sentences his indifference to her seems almost Cruel.
        Moreover as an individuality Crusoe is rather dull. His Precise and deadpan style of narration works well for recounting the Process of Canoe building but it tends to drain the excitement from events that should be thrilling. Action packed Scenes like the conquest of the cannibals become quite humdrum when Crusoe narrates them giving us a detailed inventory of the cannibals in list from for example.
           His instance on dating events makes Sense to a Point but it ultimately ends up seeming obsessive and irreverent when he tells us the date on which he grinds his tools but neglects to tell us the date of a very important event like meeting Friday. Perhaps his impulse to record facts carefully is not a survival skill, but an irritating sign of his neurosis.

           Finally while not boasting of heroism Crusoe in nonetheless very interested in Possession power and prestige. When he first call himself king of the Island It seems jocund but when he describes the Sapphire as his subject we must take his really does consider himself king.
             His teaching Friday to call him ‘master’ even before teaching him the words for yes or no seems, obnoxious even under the racist standard of the day as if Crusoe needs to hear ego-boosting words spoken as soon as Possible.

          Overall, Crusoe’s virtues tend to be Private his industry, resourcefulness and solitary courage makes him an exemplary individual. But his vices are Social and his urge to subjugate other is highly objectionable. In bringing both sides together into one complex character Defoe gives us fascinating glimpse into the successful, failures, and contradictions of modern man.
                                   
The necessity of repentance:-

        Crusoe’s experiences constitution not simply an adventure story in which thrilling happen but also a moral tale illustrating the right and wrong ways to live one’s life. This moral tale illustrating the right and wrong ways and religions dimension of the tale is indicated in the Crusoe’s story is being Publish to instruct other in gods wisdom and one vital part of this wisdom is for gods miracles as Crusoe is when his grain Sprouts it is not enough simply to express gratitude or even to pray to god as Crusoe needs repentance most as he learns from the fiery angelic figure that comes to him during a furnish hallucination and says:
 “Seeing all these things
    Have not brought thee to
Repentance, now thou
Shall die.”
  Crusoe believes that his major sin in his rebellious behavior towards his father which he refers to as his Adam and Eve first disobedience of god. This biblical reference also suggests that Crusoe exile from civilization represents Adam and Eve’s expulsion from Eden.
                   For Crusoe repentance consists of acknowledging his wretchedness and his absolute dependence on the lord. This admission marks a turning point in Crusoe’s spiritual consciousness and is almost a born again experience for him. After repentance he complains much less about his sad fate and views the island more positively. Later when Crusoe is rescued and his fortune restored he compares himself to job who also regained divine favor. Ironically this views of the necessity of repentance ands up justifying sin: Crusoe may never have learned to repent if he had never sinfully disobeyed his father in the first place. Is In the novel, it is nevertheless complex and ambiguous.
The cross:-
                     Concerned that he well “lose reckoning of time” in chapter, Crusoe makes the passing of days “with knife upon a large post in capital letters and making it into a great cross….. set it up on the Shore where he first landed…”the large size and capital letters show us how important this cross is to Crusoe as a timekeeping device and thus also a way of relating himself to the larger social world where dates and calendar still matter but the cross is also a symbol of his own new life in Christ after baptism an immersion in water like Crusoe’s shipwreck experience. Yet Crusoe’s large cross seems somewhat blasphemous in making no reference to Christ. Island it is a memorial to Crusoe himself, underscoring how completely he has become the center of his own life. 

Hamlet Cultural Studies

                       Dave Mayuri P.
M.A.                   : Sem -1
Roll No.             :15
Ppaer No. 1      : The Renaissance literature 
Topic Name    : Hamlet cultural studies

Submitted by : Department of English                                      M.K.B.U.


·        Hamlet

Cultural Studies examines power relationships also. It emphasis on it. For example, Cultural studies and its critics assume "oppositional roles in terms of power structures, wherever they might be found. It wants us to have a lance at some marginalized characters we have not been given enough importance and those who should have been given recognition in their lives. Ho politics, power, indeed on all matters that deeply affect people's practical and day to day lives. The people who have money and power position they will be given importance and recognition, no matter whether they deserve or not. No one those people. Who have power so the hero of Shakespeare's novel 'Hamlet' comes under that category.
Hamlet is the play within the play. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are marginalized characters. Claudius - villain is having a necessary talk arth Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet's fellow students from wittenloery.  They were studying there. In response to Claudius's plan to send Hamlet to England Rosencrantz delivers a speech. They both were not at the centre and they were not having any inheritance like Hamlet was the son of late king Hamlet and belonged to Royal family but they were intelligent, educated with a proper understanding. Rosencrantz's speech shows his excellence and mastery over language.

·        The Speech of Rosencrantz's :

The singular and peculiar life is bound
With all the strength and armor of the mind
To keep itself from noyance, but much more
That spirit upon whose weal depends and rests
The lives of many.The cease of majesty 
Dies not alone, but like a gulf doth draw
what's near it with it. It is a massy wheel
Fixed on the summit of the highest mount,
To whose huge spokes ten thousand lesser things
Are mortised and adjoined ;which,when it falls,
Each small annexment , petty consequences,
Attends the boisterous ruin. Never alone
Did the king sigh but with a general groan.  

The passage is a thoughtful one. It is praiseworthy. This is one of the examples of excellence of a marginalized character. In spite of having access of excellence they have been marginalized and Hamlet being a hero. From a wealthy and Royal Family has been put into the category of a moral hero. Who has a few lacks also. The question arises about the people  howmany people will be there to notice it ? These lines should have been considered as the best known lines of the play, but they have been ignored. Hamlet's soliloquies, king's soliloquy of conscience his futile efforts to pray to god have been considered the best well-known lines as compared to Rosencrantz's speech.  Guildenstern had just agreed that he and Rosencrantz would do as they were told by the king. The agreement is only a reaffirmation of what they had told the king when he first received them at court. The two are distinctly plot - driven : empty of personality, sycophantic in a sniveling way, eager to curry favour with power even if it means spying on their erstwhile, Friend. They  admit, without mush skill at deniel, that they "were sent for".
The meanings of their names match what seems to be the essence of their characters. Murray J. Levith, has written that "Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern are from the Dutch - German : literally, 'garland of roses and' golden star'. Their names give them a position and meaning lightness.
These details do not seem to fit the personalities and general vacuity of Shakespeare's two incompetents. So it becomes necessary to know and have a look at what they do and what is done to them. They were students at Wittenberg. They return to Denmark, because they were requested by claudius. They try to Dry from Hamlet and his inner thoughts what he has been thinking and wanting for many days since his Father's  death, especially his ambitions and frustrations about the crown. Hamlet foils them. They crumble before his own questioning. Claudies then sends them on an embassy with Hamlet, carrying a letter to the king of England that would have been executed by Hamlet. They both may not have known the contents of that letter or "Grand Commission". Hamlet's suspicion and dought is enough for him to decide their future. Here Hamlet has capacity to device Murderous schemes.
Hamlet's action in replacing the king's letter which Rosencrantz and Guidenstern were carrying by another letter which  asks English authorities to put an end to the life of these two men shows again that Hamlet can be heartless when occasion demands it. When Horatio remarks that Guildenstern and Rosencrantz have gone to their death, Hamlet feels not the least regret in having sent them to their death, but syas :
They are not near my conscience; their 
defeat Does by their own insinuation grow.
This incident also shows that Hamlet can, on certain occasions, device and pursue murderous schemes. In spite of doing this Hamlet is seen as a moral characters who is given importance and recognition but no one considers Hamlet as a murderer. It shows how power plays a vital role in one's life. First Guildenstern and Rosencrantz were called and requested by Claudius  to know about Hamlet's mind and his desire so they both are used by Claudius. Second they were sent to their deaths by Hamlet so they are used by Hamlet. They are pawns for claudius first, for Hamlet second. It is almost as if Hamlet had tried before the sea voyage to warn them of their insignificant state; he calls Rosencrantz a sponge, Provoking. The message of power goes on and on. At first they intended only good For their erstwhile school fellow. But their more constant motive is to dease the king, the power that has brought them here. This shows power in the world of kings and princes. England had known the effects of such power off for centuries. The time of Elizabeth is well-known. Witness especially the fate of the second Earl of Essex. Whose attempt at rebellion led to his own, execution, Marry Queen's execution. Who had been imprisoned by Elizabeth for years before Elizabeth signed the death warrant. With this history. We can understand how long, It had been going on and why Shakespeare's work shows power struggles.
Claudius was aware of Power. He minutely observed his madness that madness in great ones must not unwatched go". So Rosencrantz and Guildenstern might have observed that power in Great ones also must not unwatched go.
Here our emphasis in the present reading is that one can gain a further insight into the play, and indeed into Shakespeare's culture, by thinking not about kings and princes but about the lesser and minor characters in appositions.

·        What is to be understood :

                   It is necessary to enrich our response to Hamlet by looking at a related cultural and philosophical. Manifestation from the twentieth century. In the twentieth century the dead, or never living & Rosencrantz and Guildenstern where resuscitated by Tom stppard in a Fascinating re-seeing of their existence, or its lack. They are seeking constantly to know. Who they are going. It is to note that the essence of Marginalization is here : Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are archetypal human beings caught up on a ship - that  leads nowhere, except to death, a death for persons who are already dead. If Shakespeare marginalized the powerless in his own version of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, stoppared has marginalized us all in an era when - in the eyes of some all of us are caught up in forces beyond our control. In other words, a cultural and historical view that was shakespeare's is radically reworked to reflect a cultural and philosophical view of another time-our own.

·        What cultural studies wants :

                   So cultural studies gives us as a view from history and historical events or incident what had been going on from centuries and power position had played a vital role in an individual's life and marginalized characters had been ignored and their noble characteristics had been suppressed in spite of having morality and high moral values whereas heroes from royal and wealthy families were being described as noble characters in spite of being immoral and inconstant people so cultural studies wants us to have a look at those marginalized characters.

·        Hamlet's Lacks :
                   Hamlet has many lacks. For example he has lack of determination when he has a chance to kill & Claudius while praying to god Hamlet thinks that if, he kills Claudius now then he will directly go to heaven because he is praying to God but if he had killed Claudius   at that time then he would not have killed innocent polonious. Hamlet should have repented after killing polonius that he has killed the father of the girl whom he has loved truely but he does not think so and goes on talking with his mother Gertrude. As he sends Guildenstern and Rosencrantz to their deaths. He was not a man of action. He is capable of Man of action. Such a primitive hero was not likely to be of interest to shakespeare when he was at the height of his creative powers. What he did was to imagine a noble and sweet price, placed in a situation where his acknowledge duty all the more difficult. Hamlet a Man who could not kill his guilty uncle claudius but kills the innocent polonious. He does so without knowing the identity of his victim. He feels not the least compunction or remorre on discovering that his victim is polonius. Hamlet appears to be most callous.
                   Hamlet has capacity for bitter and cynical wit. When Hamlet is asked what he has done with the dead body of polonius. He replies : "Compounded it with dust, whereto" his kin." He calls Rosencrantz a sponge "That soaks up the king's coyntenarce, his reward, his authrities" When Rosencrantz again asks Hamlet replies, The body is with The King, but the king is not with the body. The King is a thing - ". Rosencrantz and Guildenstern had no idea of claudius's scheeming. They were innocent but they wanted to help both Hamlet and claudius but they are used by Hamlet and claudius and they had to sacrifice their lives too. Hamlet does not think of his two best friends with whom he has spent a lovely time and decides to put an end to their deaths. 

Contribution of Raja Rao,Mulk Raj Anand & R.K.Narayana.

Name:- Dave Mayuri P.
M.A. Sem:- 1
Roll no:-15
Paper no:- 4. Indian writing in English
Topic name:- Contribution of Raja Rao, Mulk Raj Anand, and R.K.Narayana

Submitted by:- Department of English  M.K.B.U.






Contribution of Raja Rao, Mulkraj Anand &  R.K.Narayana. 

Raja Rao:-     
                                          Raja Rao 8 november1908-2006 was an Indian Writer of English language novels and Short Story, whose works are deeply rooted in Hinduism. The serpent and The Rope 1960, a semi autobiographical novel recounting a search for Spiritual truth in Europe and India established him as one of the finest Indian Prose stylists and won him the Sahitya Academic Award in 1964. For the entire body his work, Rao was awarded the Neustadt international prize for literature in 1988. Rao ‘s wide raging body of work, Spanning a number of genres, is seen as varied and significant Contribution to Indian English literature, as well as world literature.
                       Rao was educated at Muslim schools, the Madras  Aliya in Hydrabad and the Aligarh Muslim University, where he began learning French at the University. After matriculation in 1927, Rao returned to Hydrabad and studies for his degree at Nizam’s Collage. after graduating from the University of Madras, having majored in English and history, he won the Asiatic Scholarship of the Government of Hydrabad in 1929, for study abroad. The Serpent and Rope. Rao published his first stories in French and English. During 1931-32 he contributed four article written in Kannada for Jaya Karntataka, an influential journal.

Raja Rao’s Awards:-         
·    Sahitya Academic Award -1964
·    Padma Bhushan Award- 1969
·    Padma vibhushan-2007

Raja Rao’s Work:-
 Kanthapura-1938
The Serpent and Rope-1960
The cat and Shakespeare-1965


Mulk Raj Anand:-  
           
               Mulk Raj Anand was the pioneer of the Indian English literature, Mulk Raj Anand was born on 12 dec 1905 in Peshawar the central city of Northest frontter Province his mother’s gift of story telling. Mulk Raj Anand is Indian writing in English notable for poorer caste in traditional Indian society. One of the pioneer of Indo-Anglican Fiction, he together with R.K.Narayana , Ahemad Ali, and  Raja Rao was writers in English to grain an international readership. Anand is admired for his novels and short stories, which have acquired the status of being classic works of modern Indian English literature. He is also notable for being among the first writer to incorporate Punjabi and Hindustani idioms into English and was a recipient of the civilian honor of the Padma Bhushan.

Literary style:-
                     Anand who was associated with communism, used his novels to make broad attacks on various elements of India’s social structure and on British rule in India They are considered important for their social statement.

Mulk Raj Anand’s novels:-

·    Untochable- 1935
·    Coolie- 1936
·    The village- 1939
·    Two leaves and a Bud- 1937
·    The Sward and the sickle- 1942
·    The Big Heart- 1945
 

R.K.Narayana:-
               R.k.Narayan was born on 10 October 1906-13 May 2001. R.k.narayana full name Rasipuram Krishnaswami Iyer Nrayanaswami was an Indian writer, best known for his works set in the fictional South fictional South Indian town of Malgudi. he is one of three leading figures of early Indian literature in English Mulk Raj Anand and Raja Rao and is credited with bringing the genere to the rest of the world.
                              
            Narayana’s  short-story writing style has been compared to that of guy de Maupassant as they both have an ability to compares the narrative without loosing out on elements of the story. Narayana has also come in for criticism for being too simple in his Prose and diction.

List of Work:-    
Novels:-
·      Swami and Friends- 1935
·      The Bachelor of Arts- 1937
·      The Dark Room- 1938
·      The English Teacher- 1945
·      The waiting for The Mahatma- 1955
·      The Guide- 1958
·      The Man eater of Malgudi- 1961

Non-Fiction:-
·    My Dateless Diary- 1960
·    My days- 1974
·    The Emerald Route- 1980

Short-story collection:-
·      Malgudi Days- 1942
·      An Astrologers Day- 1947
·      A Horse aand two Goats- 1970
·      The Grandmothers Tale and selected stories-1994.

Awards:-
             Narayana won numerous awards during the Crusoe of his literary career. His first major awards was in 1958 the Sahitya Academic Award. Padma Vibhushan.
     
        Though R.K.Narayan is famous as a novelist novel written short stories, travelogues essays, retold legends besides his memoir.
All of the difference stage of his life, and we can say that his life has trickled down to his writing.